Vangent, Inc.
CIK 1402478Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 1,225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 1.01 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 1,225 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Morgan Lewis | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.17 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Benjamin M. PolkSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael R. LittenbergSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Luis R. PenalverCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin M. PolkSchulte Roth & Zabel | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael R. LittenbergSchulte Roth & Zabel | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 52 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Luis R. PenalverCahill Gordon & Reindel | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.60 |