Erin Energy Corp. ERN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1402281Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Apr 2015 to Jul 2017
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jul 2015 · Named in a filing · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in a filing · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- TroyGould PCFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Jul 2015 | Named in a filing | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Sidley Austin | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Jul 2011 | Named in a filing | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| TroyGould PC | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 125 | 0.73 | 1.37 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John D. GeddesBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jul 2015 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- James L. Rice IIIAkin GumpFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.79× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Dawn Bernd-SchulzPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Scott C. KlinePillsbury WinthropFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 3.13× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Lawrence P. SchnappTroyGould PCFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 2.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John D. GeddesBaker Botts L.L.P. | Jul 2015 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| James L. Rice IIIAkin Gump | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.11 | 1.79 | 1.33 |
| Dawn Bernd-SchulzPillsbury Winthrop | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.66 | 1.89 | 1.71 |
| Scott C. KlinePillsbury Winthrop | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.73 | 3.13 | 2.34 |
| Lawrence P. SchnappTroyGould PC | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.63 | 0.98 | 2.08 |