Paragon Shipping Inc. PRGN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1401112Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2014 to Feb 2016
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Watson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seward & Kissel | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Norton Rose | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Watson Farley & Williams | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 93 | 0.59 | 0.32 | 1.37 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward S. HortonSeward & KisselFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Gary J. WolfeSeward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.65×
- Robert E. LustrinSeward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 3.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward S. HortonSeward & Kissel | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 2.01 |
| Gary J. WolfeSeward & Kissel | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 2.65 |
| Robert E. LustrinSeward & Kissel | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 40 | 1.29 | 0.55 | 3.08 |