iHeartMedia, Inc. IHRT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1400891Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Jun 2021 to May 2024
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Akin GumpFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2021 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Akin Gump | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Ropes & Gray | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Goodwin Procter | May 2007 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Sidley Austin | May 2007 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2007 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis CraythornLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Brian D. WolfeKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.17×
- Brian WolfeDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- James S. RoweKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
- Brian C. ErbRopes & GrayFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.31× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- David C. ChapinRopes & GrayFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Elisabeth M. MartinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Frank ReddickAkin GumpFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Alfred O. RoseRopes & GrayFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
- Joseph L. Johnson IIIGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis CraythornLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2021 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Brian D. WolfeKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.17 |
| Brian WolfeDavis Polk | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| James S. RoweKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 2.06 |
| Brian C. ErbRopes & Gray | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.31 | 0.80 | 0.36 |
| David C. ChapinRopes & Gray | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Elisabeth M. MartinLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 33 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Frank ReddickAkin Gump | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| Alfred O. RoseRopes & Gray | May 2007 | Text search only | 27 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 2.24 |
| Joseph L. Johnson IIIGoodwin Procter | May 2007 | Text search only | 20 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 1.58 |