MARSHALL & ILSLEY CORP MI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1399315Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Godfrey & KahnFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Godfrey & Kahn | Jun 2009 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gusrae Kaplan & Bruno | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.60 | 1.31 | 0.89 |
| Quarles & Brady | May 2007 | Text search only | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Sidley Austin | May 2007 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | May 2007 | Text search only | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2007 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- C. Andrew GerlachSullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. Andrew GerlachSullivan & Cromwell | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2007 | Text search only | 117 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.49 |