Xinyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd. XIN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1398453Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Dec 2007 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Friedman Kaplan Seiler & AdelmanFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Hodgson RussFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- King & WoodFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Ziegler Ziegler & AssociatesFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Maples and Calder | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 18 | 1.68 | 0.98 | 1.53 |
| Hodgson Russ | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 85 | 1.15 | 0.91 | 1.39 |
| King & Wood | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Ziegler Ziegler & Associates | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 37 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.97 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carol B. StubblefieldBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Omer OzdenBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.05× · Went dark 1.94× · 95% wipeout 3.38×
- Scott ClemensBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carol B. StubblefieldBaker & McKenzie | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Omer OzdenBaker & McKenzie | Nov 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 3.05 | 1.94 | 3.38 |
| Scott ClemensBaker & McKenzie | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.96 |