Duff & Phelps Corp DUF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1397821Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Sep 2007 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
| King & Spalding | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
| Davis Polk | May 2007 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua M. ZachariahKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard B. AftanasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- David J. GoldschmidtSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Michael KaplanDavis PolkFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua M. ZachariahKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard B. AftanasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| David J. GoldschmidtSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 74 | 1.03 | 0.58 | 1.27 |
| Michael KaplanDavis Polk | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 112 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.86 |