IKARIA, INC.
CIK 1396990Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 16
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Jones WalkerFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Arent FoxFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 742 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 259 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Fried FrankFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Michael Best & FriedrichFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 65 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Stevens & LeeFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Stradley Ronon Stevens & YoungFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HALE AND DORR | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.06 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| Jones Walker | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.91 |
| Arent Fox | May 2010 | Text search only | 90 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.91 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2010 | Text search only | 742 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | May 2010 | Text search only | 259 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Fried Frank | May 2010 | Text search only | 540 | 1.32 | 0.24 | 0.86 |
| Heller Ehrman | May 2010 | Text search only | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 1.02 |
| Michael Best & Friedrich | May 2010 | Text search only | 65 | 1.52 | 0.48 | 0.56 |
| Morgan Lewis | May 2010 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.17 | 0.31 | 1.00 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | May 2010 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
| Stevens & Lee | May 2010 | Text search only | 127 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.61 |
| Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young | May 2010 | Text search only | 97 | 0.77 | 0.18 | 0.73 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2010 | Text search only | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Matthew F. HermanFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Matthew F. HermanFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | May 2010 | Text search only | 8 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.93 |