COMANCHE CLEAN ENERGY CORP
CIK 1396762Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Guzov OfsinkFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Morse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guzov Ofsink | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 1.08 | 0.32 | 1.11 |
| Maples and Calder | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Morse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 56 | 0.85 | 0.52 | 1.80 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Darren OfsinkGuzov OfsinkFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Kenneth S. RoseMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darren OfsinkGuzov Ofsink | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 1.25 | 0.56 | 1.19 |
| Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin Naftalis | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 90 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 1.42 |
| Kenneth S. RoseMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 21 | 0.41 | 0.53 | 1.63 |