GT Advanced Technologies Inc. GTAT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1394954Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Moore & Van AllenFirst linked Jul 2008 · Text search only · 131 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Burns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Moore & Van Allen | Jul 2008 | Text search only | 131 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 0.90 |
| Foley Hoag | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Burns & Levinson LLP | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 35 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David A. FineRopes & GrayFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.95× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher D. ComeauRopes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Keith F. HigginsRopes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Elisabeth M. MartinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Eva H. DavisKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
- Dennis M. MyersKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Rachel PhillipsRopes & GrayFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Frank A. SegallBurns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David A. FineRopes & Gray | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 17 | 2.95 | 1.71 | 0.00 |
| Christopher D. ComeauRopes & Gray | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Keith F. HigginsRopes & Gray | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Elisabeth M. MartinLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Eva H. DavisKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.95 |
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Rachel PhillipsRopes & Gray | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 23 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 2.03 |
| Frank A. SegallBurns & Levinson LLP | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 6 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.13 |