GEOVERA INSURANCE HOLDINGS, LTD.
CIK 1393941Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.80 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2007 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Tracy K. EdmonsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Robert J. SullivanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James WestraHUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMARFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Neil W. TownsendBingham DanaFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tracy K. EdmonsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Robert J. SullivanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2007 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James WestraHUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMAR | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 18 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Neil W. TownsendBingham Dana | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 5 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 3.77 |