PNA Group Holding CORP
CIK 1393897Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Kilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willkie Farr | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.82 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Kilpatrick Stockton | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 191 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John PapachristosCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Gene G. LewisFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- James W. LossBingham McCutchenFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Peter D. LyonsShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John PapachristosCahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Gene G. LewisFulbright & Jaworski | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| James W. LossBingham McCutchen | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 9 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Peter D. LyonsShearman & Sterling | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 25 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.32 |