Alternative Asset Management Acquisition Corp. GAMR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1393816Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 769 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Paul Hastings | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 769 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
| Akin Gump | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.21 | 0.52 | 1.16 |
| Graubard Miller | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.15 |
| Davis Polk | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David MillerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 339 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Bruce S. MendelsohnAkin GumpFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 417 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Investment BankingFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 454 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David MillerLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 339 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.96 |
| Bruce S. MendelsohnAkin Gump | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 47 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 417 | 0.79 | 0.42 | 1.02 |
| Investment Banking | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 454 | 0.92 | 1.19 | 1.28 |