PROS Holdings, Inc. PRO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1392972Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- John J. Gilluly III, P.C.First linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| John J. Gilluly III, P.C. | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Bracewell LLP | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Davis Polk | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.33 |
| Piper Rudnick | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Thompson & Knight | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John J. Gilluly IIIDLA Piper | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 |