Starent Networks, Corp. STAR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1391672Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HALE AND DORR | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| Goodwin Procter | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- William J. SchnoorGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 66 | 1.51 | 0.43 | 1.51 |
| Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORR | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| William J. SchnoorGoodwin Procter | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 23 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 1.07 |