RSC Holdings Inc. RRR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1389305Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- White & CaseFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 0.98 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.24 |
| Reed Smith | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.12 |
| Shaw Pittman | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.04 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 244 | 1.33 | 1.19 | 1.35 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.04 |
| Torys LLP | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 170 | 1.21 | 0.44 | 0.92 |
| White & Case | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew D. SoussloffSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Francis J. AquilaSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
- Jeffrey J. RosenDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Matthew E. KaplanDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.84×
- William B. GannettCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Stephen R. RusmiselWinthrop, Stimson, Putnam & RobertsFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew D. SoussloffSullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Francis J. AquilaSullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.34 |
| Jeffrey J. RosenDebevoise & Plimpton | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Matthew E. KaplanDebevoise & Plimpton | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 1.84 |
| William B. GannettCahill Gordon & Reindel | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.99 |
| Stephen R. RusmiselWinthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.29 |