Premier Power Renewable Energy, Inc. PPRW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1388686Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- FRANK J. HARITON ATTORNEY - AT - LAWFirst linked Sep 2007 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| FRANK J. HARITON ATTORNEY - AT - LAW | Sep 2007 | Text search only | 33 | 0.58 | 1.12 | 0.88 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Richard H. GildenKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Jamie H. KimRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Frank J. HaritonFRANK J. HARITON ATTORNEY - AT - LAWFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Dominador TolentinoRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 2.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin Naftalis | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 90 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 1.42 |
| Richard H. GildenKramer Levin Naftalis | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Jamie H. KimRichardson & Patel LLP | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 1.05 |
| Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLP | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 0.52 | 0.97 | 1.49 |
| Frank J. HaritonFRANK J. HARITON ATTORNEY - AT - LAW | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.75 |
| Dominador TolentinoRichardson & Patel LLP | Nov 2008 | Text search only | 10 | 0.82 | 1.45 | 2.38 |