KBL Healthcare Acquisition Corp III KHA.U (last ticker on record)
CIK 1388356Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.37 |
| Sidley Austin | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Epstein Becker & Green | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 0.99 |
| Graubard Miller | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brad L. ShiffmanBlank RomeFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Brian L. RossGraubard MillerFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.22×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Eric S. HaueterSidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jack I. KantrowitzDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard MillerFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad L. ShiffmanBlank Rome | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.33 | 0.74 | 1.62 |
| Brian L. RossGraubard Miller | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3.22 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.28 |
| Eric S. HaueterSidley Austin | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jack I. KantrowitzDLA Piper | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 11 | 3.68 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard Miller | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 1.19 |