U.S. Stem Cell, Inc. USRM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1388319Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jill Arlene RobbinsFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 2.78× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Arlene Robbins | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.34 | 2.78 | 0.37 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Hunton & Williams | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Faegre & Benson | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jill Arlene RobbinsJill Arlene RobbinsFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 3.31× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Andy SmithSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrew SmithSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 267 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- David E. WellsHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.07× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Anthony J. MarsicoGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 3.57× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jill Arlene RobbinsJill Arlene Robbins | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.64 | 3.31 | 0.38 |
| Andy SmithSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Feb 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
| Andrew SmithSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jan 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.20 | 1.72 | 0.36 |
| Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 267 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 1.24 |
| David E. WellsHunton & Williams | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 3.07 | 0.00 |
| Anthony J. MarsicoGreenberg Traurig | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 33 | 0.38 | 3.57 | 1.29 |