VLOV INC. SNOH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1388311Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- LKP Global Law, LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.11×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- AllBright Law OfficesFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- The Law Office of Conrad C. LysiakFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LKP Global Law, LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.11 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| AllBright Law Offices | May 2010 | Text search only | 106 | 0.72 | 1.49 | 1.16 |
| The Law Office of Conrad C. Lysiak | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 115 | 0.69 | 1.57 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dominador TolentinoRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 2.38×
- Francis ChenRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.49× · 95% wipeout 2.32×
- Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Steve ZhuAllBright Law OfficesFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 3.66× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominador TolentinoRichardson & Patel LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.82 | 1.45 | 2.38 |
| Francis ChenRichardson & Patel LLP | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 2.32 |
| Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLP | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 34 | 0.52 | 0.97 | 1.49 |
| Steve ZhuAllBright Law Offices | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 15 | 0.62 | 3.66 | 1.85 |