Consorteum Holdings, Inc.
CIK 1387976Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- SOL V. SLOTNIK, P.C.First linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.25× · Went dark 1.44× · 95% wipeout 3.42×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in a filing · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOL V. SLOTNIK, P.C. | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 3.25 | 1.44 | 3.42 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Jan 2007 | Named in a filing | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sol V. SlotnikSOL V. SLOTNIK, P.C.First linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.65× · Went dark 2.39× · 95% wipeout 2.65×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Matheau J. W. StoutFirst linked Jan 2018 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol V. SlotnikSOL V. SLOTNIK, P.C. | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 2.65 | 2.39 | 2.65 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Jan 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |
| Matheau J. W. Stout | Jan 2018 | Text search only | 29 | 1.68 | 1.54 | 0.60 |