TONGJITANG CHINESE MEDICINES CO TCM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1386608Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Global Law OfficeFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Jun He Law OfficesFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Maples and Calder | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Global Law Office | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 67 | 1.06 | 0.80 | 1.14 |
| Jun He Law Offices | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 73 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert A. GraumanBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.62× · Went dark 3.24× · 95% wipeout 2.82×
- Edwin AstudilloSheppard MullinFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Jason R. SchendelSheppard MullinFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Louis LehotCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.94×
- Scott ClemensBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- David LambConyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert A. GraumanBaker & McKenzie | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.62 | 3.24 | 2.82 |
| Edwin AstudilloSheppard Mullin | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Jason R. SchendelSheppard Mullin | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Louis LehotCooley LLP | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.94 |
| Scott ClemensBaker & McKenzie | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.22 |
| David LambConyers Dill & Pearman | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.79 |