LDK Solar Co., Ltd.
CIK 1385424Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Grandall Law FirmFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Ziegler Ziegler & AssociatesFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- King & WoodFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- White & CaseFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grandall Law Firm | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Sidley Austin | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
| Ziegler Ziegler & Associates | May 2007 | Text search only | 37 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.91 |
| King & Wood | May 2007 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.23 |
| White & Case | May 2007 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward D. RicchiutoSidley AustinFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Renee XiongSidley AustinFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward D. RicchiutoSidley Austin | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Renee XiongSidley Austin | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 9 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 56 | 1.86 | 1.00 | 1.12 |