DNIB UNWIND, INC. BIND (last ticker on record)
CIK 1385228Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Oct 2013 to Oct 2016
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Covington & Burling | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Foley Hoag | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Jones Day | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew T. BushLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- B. Shayne KennedyLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Haim ZaltzmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew T. BushLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| B. Shayne KennedyLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 43 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Haim ZaltzmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 27 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin Procter | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 43 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.47 |