Monogram Residential Trust, Inc. MORE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1384710Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Locke LordFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Jan 2008 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 2014 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| DLA Piper | Dec 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Locke Lord | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Alston & Bird | Jan 2008 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Dec 2007 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher R. StambaughDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- R. Neil MillerDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert H. BergdoltDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin Procter | Nov 2014 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christopher R. StambaughDLA Piper | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| R. Neil MillerDLA Piper | Dec 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert H. BergdoltDLA Piper | Dec 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.98 |