Simcere Pharmaceutical Group
CIK 1384360Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Jingtian & GongchengFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Maples and Calder | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 199 | 0.80 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.80 |
| Jingtian & Gongcheng | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 154 | 1.10 | 0.63 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul StreckerShearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Ling HuangCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- W. Clayton JohnsonCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alan SeemShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Matthew D. BersaniShearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Chris LinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2008 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Patrick J. NaughtonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2008 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul StreckerShearman & Sterling | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Ling HuangCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| W. Clayton JohnsonCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alan SeemShearman & Sterling | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Matthew D. BersaniShearman & Sterling | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 25 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.24 |
| Chris LinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2008 | Text search only | 39 | 1.27 | 1.55 | 1.59 |
| Patrick J. NaughtonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2008 | Text search only | 18 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.38 |