Grizzly Energy, LLC VNRR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1384072Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Oct 2017 · Named in a filing · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in a filing · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Wyatt Tarrant & CombsFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Potter Anderson & CorroonFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Winstead PCFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Oct 2017 | Named in a filing | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Paul Hastings | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Bracewell LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2007 | Named in a filing | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Wyatt Tarrant & Combs | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 1.40 | 0.35 | 1.08 |
| Akin Gump | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Potter Anderson & Corroon | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 127 | 1.41 | 0.45 | 0.87 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Winstead PC | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 121 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 1.27 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott GolenbockMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Oct 2017 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Stuart MorrissyHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Oct 2017 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James R. BrownWinston & StrawnFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Stephen W. Grant Jr.Haynes and BooneFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Douglas V. GettenPaul HastingsFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.89×
- Gary W. OrloffBracewell LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Stephen M. GillVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Douglas E. McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- John GoodgameAkin GumpFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Shaun J. MathewKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Mark A. MortonSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott GolenbockMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Oct 2017 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Stuart MorrissyHogan Lovells US LLP | Oct 2017 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James R. BrownWinston & Strawn | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.45 |
| Stephen W. Grant Jr.Haynes and Boone | Jul 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Douglas V. GettenPaul Hastings | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.89 |
| Gary W. OrloffBracewell LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Stephen M. GillVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| David P. OelmanVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 78 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Douglas E. McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| John GoodgameAkin Gump | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 22 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Shaun J. MathewKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 10 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Mark A. MortonSullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 9 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 67 | 1.30 | 0.56 | 1.11 |