LRI HOLDINGS, INC.
CIK 1383875Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 0.98 |
| King & Spalding | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter J. LoughranDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Jason K. ZacharyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Keith M. TownsendKing & SpaldingFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Joshua KoganKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter J. LoughranDebevoise & Plimpton | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Jason K. ZacharyKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Keith M. TownsendKing & Spalding | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Joshua KoganKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.04 |