MASONITE INTERNATIONAL INC.
CIK 1383505Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Pinsent MasonsFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Holland & Knight | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Arthur Cox | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
| Mayer Brown | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Pinsent Masons | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 27 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kathryn Gettles-AtwaWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Gary I. HorowitzSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Joseph KaufmanSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathryn Gettles-AtwaWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jan 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Gary I. HorowitzSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 53 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Joseph KaufmanSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 45 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.46 |