Trina Solar LTD TSL_OLD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1382158Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- King & WoodFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Jun He Law OfficesFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| King & Wood | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.23 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | May 2007 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 199 | 0.80 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
| Jun He Law Offices | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 73 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 1.17 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jesse SheleyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.15×
- Benjamin SuKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- John A. OtoshiLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Benjamin W. JamesKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- John C. WilliamsLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jesse SheleyKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| Benjamin SuKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.24 |
| John A. OtoshiLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.77 | 1.17 | 1.36 |
| Benjamin W. JamesKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 47 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| John C. WilliamsLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 21 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.23 |