Tsingda eEDU Corp
CIK 1381790Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Gusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Gusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 76 | 0.60 | 1.31 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Adam MimelesEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 2.55×
- Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 187 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Daniel H. LucianoFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.68× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Lawrence G. NusbaumGusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Matthew D. BersaniShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Paul StreckerShearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam MimelesEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.55 |
| Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 187 | 0.98 | 1.25 | 1.32 |
| Daniel H. Luciano | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.11 | 1.68 | 0.77 |
| Lawrence G. NusbaumGusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 46 | 0.99 | 1.57 | 0.70 |
| Matthew D. BersaniShearman & Sterling | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 25 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Paul StreckerShearman & Sterling | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.40 |