Imperium Renewables Inc
CIK 1381697Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- HOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKINFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
| DLA Piper | May 2007 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| HOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKIN | May 2007 | Text search only | 31 | 0.94 | 1.73 | 1.66 |
| Sidley Austin | May 2007 | Text search only | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADYHOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKINFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Howard Rice NemerovskiHOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKINFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Mark F. HoffmanDLA PiperFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul C. PringleSidley AustinFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 2.65× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADYHOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKIN | May 2007 | Text search only | 24 | 1.23 | 0.79 | 0.60 |
| Howard Rice NemerovskiHOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKIN | May 2007 | Text search only | 23 | 1.25 | 0.83 | 0.62 |
| Mark F. HoffmanDLA Piper | May 2007 | Text search only | 7 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul C. PringleSidley Austin | May 2007 | Text search only | 12 | 1.69 | 2.65 | 0.00 |