Stewart & Stevenson LLC
CIK 1381455Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Baker BottsFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Jones DayFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 685 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Pryor Cashman | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.25 |
| Baker Botts | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 0.98 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.32 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.26 |
| Jones Day | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 685 | 1.25 | 0.55 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John C. EricsonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- J. Eric MakiSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Stephan J. FederSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John C. EricsonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| J. Eric MakiSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 1.68 |
| Stephan J. FederSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 1.30 |