Giggles N' Hugs, Inc. GIGL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1381435Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Libertas Law GroupFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.01× · Went dark 2.19× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Stoecklein Law GroupFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libertas Law Group | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 3.01 | 2.19 | 1.62 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Stoecklein Law Group | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.88 | 1.32 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark Y. AbdouRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 2.72× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Donald J. StoeckleinStoecklein Law GroupFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.48× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Wendy E. MillerFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Y. AbdouRichardson & Patel LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.35 | 2.72 | 0.86 |
| Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.87 | 1.30 | 1.41 |
| Donald J. StoeckleinStoecklein Law Group | Feb 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 1.55 | 1.48 | 1.00 |
| Wendy E. Miller | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 0.60 |