Plastic2Oil, Inc. PTOI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1381105Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- SEC ATTORNEYSFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pryor Cashman | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| SEC ATTORNEYS | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 31 | 1.18 | 1.73 | 0.56 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edward C. NormandinPryor CashmanFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Gary S. EatonANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Randall V. BrumbaughFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.29× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Ted D. Campbell IIFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edward C. NormandinPryor Cashman | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Gary S. EatonANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.88 | 0.45 | 1.54 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |
| Randall V. Brumbaugh | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 33 | 0.29 | 0.90 | 0.73 |
| Ted D. Campbell II | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.07 | 0.78 | 0.00 |