RAFAELLA APPAREL GROUP,INC.
CIK 1379420Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Eaton & Van Winkle LLPFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Hahn & HessenFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Kronish Lieb Weiner & HellmanFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Nov 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Eaton & Van Winkle LLP | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 49 | 0.35 | 1.45 | 1.17 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Hahn & Hessen | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.99 |
| Kronish Lieb Weiner & Hellman | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 34 | 1.00 | 1.47 | 1.85 |
| Proskauer Rose | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David E. RosewaterSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Michael R. LittenbergSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Julie M. AllenProskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Stuart D. FreedmanSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David E. RosewaterSchulte Roth & Zabel | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.78 | 1.73 | 1.29 |
| Michael R. LittenbergSchulte Roth & Zabel | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 52 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Julie M. AllenProskauer Rose | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 41 | 1.49 | 0.50 | 1.38 |
| Stuart D. FreedmanSchulte Roth & Zabel | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 24 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.36 |