Alyst Acquisition Corp. AYA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1378451Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Strategic alliance with MWE China Law OfficesFirst linked Jun 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 558 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 1,225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2009 · Text search only · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices | Jun 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 0.28 | 0.56 | 0.66 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jan 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 558 | 0.98 | 0.61 | 1.10 |
| Graubard Miller | Nov 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.15 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 1,225 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2009 | Text search only | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Barbara A. JonesGreenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 3.01× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Alan I. AnnexGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard MillerFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara A. JonesGreenberg Traurig | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.64 | 3.01 | 1.20 |
| Alan I. AnnexGreenberg Traurig | Nov 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 153 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 1.12 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.28 |
| Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard Miller | Nov 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.96 | 0.63 | 1.19 |