AtheroNova Inc. AHRO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1377053Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- 95% wipeout
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Sep 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Jan 2014 to Sep 2015
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Stradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 165 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 165 | 1.18 | 1.37 | 1.37 |
| Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 1.40 | 0.86 | 0.94 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael L. LawheadStradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.59× · Went dark 4.84× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
- Louis WhartonStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.82× · Went dark 1.85× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Greg AkselrudStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.57× · Went dark 1.44× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Eric StoppenhagenFirst linked Oct 2007 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 5.92× · 95% wipeout 2.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael L. LawheadStradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.59 | 4.84 | 1.83 |
| Louis WhartonStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.82 | 1.85 | 1.27 |
| Greg AkselrudStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.57 | 1.44 | 1.68 |
| Eric Stoppenhagen | Oct 2007 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 5.92 | 2.18 |