Hughes Network Systems, LLC
CIK 1376567Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akin GumpFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLPFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- JONES WALDO HOLBROOK & MCDONOUGHFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akin Gump | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.18 |
| Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 223 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| JONES WALDO HOLBROOK & MCDONOUGH | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 19 | 1.45 | 1.69 | 1.25 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Rosa A. TestaniAkin GumpFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Sarah P. PayneSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
- Scott D. MillerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jan 2012 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosa A. TestaniAkin Gump | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Sarah P. PayneSullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 25 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| Scott D. MillerSullivan & Cromwell | Jan 2012 | Text search only | 47 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 1.25 |