United States Natural Gas Fund, LP UNG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1376227Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Reed SmithFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 1.70 | 0.63 | 0.63 |
| Reed Smith | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Owen J. PinkertonEversheds Sutherland (US) LLPFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- W. Thomas ConnerReed SmithFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas ConnerSutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Owen J. PinkertonEversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| W. Thomas ConnerReed Smith | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas ConnerSutherland Asbill & Brennan | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 6 | 3.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 |