Canadian Solar Inc. CSIQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1375877Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- WeirFoulds LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.71×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2008 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | Aug 2013 | Named in a filing | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| WeirFoulds LLP | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 3.71 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2008 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Benjamin W. JamesKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2021 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Benjamin SuKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Fan ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Robin L. StruveLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.78×
- Allen C. WangLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Eugene Y. LeeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- John A. OtoshiLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2008 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Chris LinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin W. JamesKirkland & Ellis | May 2021 | Named in a filing | 47 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Benjamin SuKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Fan ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Robin L. StruveLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 2.78 |
| Allen C. WangLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
| Eugene Y. LeeLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.22 |
| John A. OtoshiLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.77 | 1.16 | 1.42 |
| John A. ForeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2008 | Text search only | 56 | 1.86 | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Chris LinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 39 | 1.28 | 1.55 | 1.65 |