MxEnergy Holdings Inc
CIK 1375814Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster & RussellFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Hastings | Nov 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Bracewell LLP | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Bryan Cave | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Proskauer Rose | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Ropes & Gray | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster & Russell | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 16 | 2.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael ChernickPaul Hastings | Nov 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 2.78 |