Eloqua, Inc. ELOQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1375271Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Gowling Lafleur HendersonFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2011 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Gowling Lafleur Henderson | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 59 | 0.98 | 0.63 | 1.05 |
| DLA Piper | May 2012 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Aug 2011 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Keith FlaumHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gregg L. KatzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Christopher J. AustinOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.54×
- Mark H. BurnettTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keith FlaumHogan Lovells US LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gregg L. KatzGoodwin Procter | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Christopher J. AustinOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 2.54 |
| Mark H. BurnettTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |