Vision-Ease Lens CORP
CIK 1375098Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Cohen & GrigsbyFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.84×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton & Williams | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Cohen & Grigsby | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 22 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.84 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 91 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.77 |
| Patton Boggs | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Thompson & Knight | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ronald J. LiebermanHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Timothy A. MackHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ronald J. LiebermanHunton & Williams | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Timothy A. MackHunton & Williams | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 7 | 3.70 | 0.00 | 1.59 |