SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS INC SYMX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1375063Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2008 to Oct 2020
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porter & Hedges | Jan 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | May 2007 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| White & Case | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kevin J. PoliPorter & HedgesFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Gerald S. TanenbaumCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Julie M. AllenProskauer RoseFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Robert G. ReedyPorter & HedgesFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin J. PoliPorter & Hedges | Apr 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Gerald S. TanenbaumCahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| Julie M. AllenProskauer Rose | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 41 | 1.49 | 0.50 | 1.38 |
| Robert G. ReedyPorter & Hedges | Jan 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.86 |