NextWave Wireless Inc. WAVE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1374993Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Oct 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowenstein Sandler | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- J. Patrick LoofbourrowCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- John V. BautistaOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 5.07× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Marita A. MakinenFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Patrick LoofbourrowCooley LLP | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| John V. BautistaOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 13 | 0.45 | 5.07 | 1.40 |
| Marita A. Makinen | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 7 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |