Luvu Brands, Inc. LUVU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1374567Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pearlman Law GroupFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Schneider Weinberger LLPFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- JUSTEENE BLANKENSHIPFirst linked May 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 2.40× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Harrison LawFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 68 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 1.97× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearlman Law Group | Jun 2017 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Schneider Weinberger LLP | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.59 | 2.20 | 1.44 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| JUSTEENE BLANKENSHIP | May 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.36 | 2.40 | 1.71 |
| Harrison Law | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 68 | 1.90 | 1.97 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian A. PearlmanPearlman Law GroupFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Jamie H. KimRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Diane J. HarrisonHarrison LawFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian A. PearlmanPearlman Law Group | Jun 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.67 | 1.57 | 1.13 |
| Jamie H. KimRichardson & Patel LLP | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.63 | 1.05 |
| Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLP | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.87 | 1.30 | 1.41 |
| Diane J. HarrisonHarrison Law | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 1.80 | 1.55 | 1.05 |