Green Brick Partners, Inc. GRBK (last ticker on record)

CIK 1373670Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restructuring
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Restatement

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Apr 2026
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 13; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 9; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Apr 29, 2026Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 30, 2021Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 12, 2014Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 4, 2012Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Oct 3, 2012Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 25, 2012Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 23, 2012Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 18, 2011Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 27, 2011Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 12, 2009Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 6, 2009Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 28, 2009Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Greenberg Traurig	Aug 2014	Named in SEC correspondence	1,223	1.01	1.03	1.10
Akin Gump	Jan 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	582	1.24	0.52	1.25
Cravath Swaine & Moore	Dec 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	839	1.29	0.03	0.85
Davis Polk	Jul 2014	Text search only	1,694	1.26	0.06	1.02
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.	Jul 2014	Text search only	995	1.46	0.37	0.80
Bingham McCutchen	Jan 2007	Text search only	291	0.94	0.38	1.06
Chadbourne & Parke	Jan 2007	Text search only	110	1.64	0.62	0.87
Dorsey & Whitney LLP	Jan 2007	Text search only	630	0.83	0.73	1.16
McGrath North Mullin & Kratz	Jan 2007	Text search only	18	1.03	0.00	0.62
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Jan 2007	Text search only	783	1.09	0.11	1.03
Willkie Farr	Jan 2007	Text search only	539	1.23	0.40	0.84
Davis Graham & Stubbs	Dec 2006	Text search only	142	0.97	0.97	1.46
Hogan & Hartson	Dec 2006	Text search only	390	1.03	0.30	1.18

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Kara L. MacCulloughGreenberg Traurig	Nov 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	26	0.55	2.41	0.81
Alice HsuAkin Gump	Jun 2015	Named in SEC correspondence	21	0.69	0.00	1.33
Zachary N. WittenbergAkin Gump	Apr 2015	Named in a filing	6	2.10	0.00	0.00
D. Scott BennettCravath Swaine & Moore	Nov 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	22	1.89	0.00	2.34
Craig F. ArcellaCravath Swaine & Moore	Mar 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	43	0.74	0.00	0.52
Ronald CamiCravath Swaine & Moore	Dec 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	19	1.81	0.00	1.64
Eric L. SchieleCravath Swaine & Moore	Jul 2014	Text search only	27	2.18	0.00	1.24
Kerry E. BerchemAkin Gump	Nov 2010	Text search only	13	0.62	0.00	0.00
Michael A. SchwartzWillkie Farr	Jun 2007	Text search only	24	0.74	0.00	0.00