Animal Health Holdings, Inc. AHII (last ticker on record)
CIK 1372813Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Goodwin Procter | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John M. MutkoskiGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Michael S. TurnerGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Stuart M. CableGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John M. MutkoskiGoodwin Procter | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Michael S. TurnerGoodwin Procter | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.04 | 1.54 | 0.99 |
| Stuart M. CableGoodwin Procter | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 59 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.09 |