AEROHIVE NETWORKS, INC HIVE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1372414Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jack SheridanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Melinda AndersonWhite & CaseFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.29×
- Andrew S. WilliamsonCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- David PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- John T. SheridanWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Mark B. BaudlerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Drew WilliamsonCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack SheridanLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Melinda AndersonWhite & Case | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.29 |
| Andrew S. WilliamsonCooley LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| David PeinsippCooley LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| John T. SheridanWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.51 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Mark B. BaudlerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Drew WilliamsonCooley LLP | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 |